Log on/register
BioMed Central home | Journals A-Z | Feedback | Support | My details
 

This article is part of the supplement: 50th Annual Meeting of the Society for Research into Hydrocephalus and Spina Bifida .

Open AccessOral presentation

Mechanism of CSF outflow through human arachnoid granulations using in-vitro and ex-vivo perfusion models

David W Holman1 email, Deborah M Grzybowski1,2, Shelley A Glimcher1 and Steven E Katz2

Biomedical Engineering Department, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

Department of Ophthalmology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA

author email corresponding author email

from 50th Annual Meeting of the Society for Research into Hydrocephalus and Spina Bifida
Cambridge, UK. 30 August – 2 September 2006

Cerebrospinal Fluid Research 2006, 3(Suppl 1):S11doi:10.1186/1743-8454-3-S1-S11

Published: 21 December 2006

© 2006 Holman et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Background

In communicating hydrocephalus and also idiopathic intracranial hypertension, disturbed CSF dynamics may result from an increased resistance to CSF outflow at the arachnoid granulations (AGs). To better understand the mechanism of CSF egress, we modeled the outflow of CSF through human AGs using both cell culture (in-vitro) and whole tissue (ex-vivo) perfusion models.

Materials and methods

Human AG tissue was harvested within 24 hours post-mortem and used to isolate AG cells for growth on filter inserts or fit into an Ussing perfusion chamber. Cell phenotype was identified in culture with immunocytochemical staining. Cells and/or tissue were perfused at a physiologic pressure drop. Cells/tissue were perfused with fluorescent microparticles and then fixed under experimental pressure. Fixed tissue was processed for TEM or cryo-sectioned and stained for visualization.

Results

In-vitro permeability results showed flow through the AG cells was uni-directional in the physiologic direction from the basal to apical (B→A) cell membrane. The average cellular hydraulic conductivity (Lpave) for AG cells perfused B→A was 4.49 ± 0.53 μl/min/mmHg/cm2 (n = 17) with average perfusion pressure(ΔPave) across the cell layer of 3.15 mmHg which was statistically higher (p < 0.001) than Lpave for cells perfused A→B (non-physiologic direction), 0.28 ± 0.16 μl/min/mmHg/cm2 (n = 6) with ΔPave of 3.33 mmHg.

Cells perfused physiologically (in-vitro model), showed extra-cellular cisternal spaces between overlapping AG cells suggesting a pathway for para-cellular fluid transport. Several vacuoles within the cytoplasm were shown and suggest a trans-cellular pathway for fluid flow.

Ex-vivo perfusion experiments performed at 5 mmHg pressure in the physiological direction (B→A) resulted in Lpave of 1.05 ± 0.15 μL/min/mmHg/cm2 (n = 20). The Lpave of tissue perfused in the A→B direction was 0.11 ± 0.03 μL/min/mmHg/cm2 (n = 3).

Conclusion

AG perfusion results in both in-vitro and ex-vivo models showed that flow was uni-directional and physiologic. Electron microscopy showed large intracellular vacuoles and extra-cellular cisternal spaces. These structures may represent two distinct mechanisms by which AG cells move fluid: 1: Trans-cellular transport via intra-cellular vacuoles, 2: Para-cellular transport via extra-cellular cisterns.

Have something to say? Post a comment on this article!


© 1999-2010 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of Springer Science+Business Media.